Vivo U20 vs Redmi Note
8 Compared: Cost, Execution, Cameras, and More
Vivo as of late propelled the Vivo U20 in
India, and simply like the Vivo U10, this model is likewise evaluated
forcefully. Normally, a cell phone promising extraordinary highlights and
execution for around Rs. 10,000 will produce a ton of premium, and with such a
significant number of choices in the market things could get befuddling. At
present, purchasers can pick between new dispatches, for example, the Redmi
Note 8, Vivo U20, and Realme 5s, yet which one would it be advisable for you to
go for? We put the Redmi Note 8 and the Vivo U20 in a no holds barred
correlation with which is the better one for you to purchase.
Redmi Note 8 Vs Vivo U20 Structure
Both Xiaomi and Vivo have structured these
telephones to look and feel great regardless of their low costs. Between the
two it is the Redmi Note 8【₹ 9,999】(Review)
that has the better form quality, and it looks and feels progressively premium.
Xiaomi has utilized Corning Gorilla Glass 5 at the front and the back though
Vivo doesn't specify any kind of security for the U20, which has a plastic
back.
The Redmi Note 8 has a level back while the
edge is adjusted, however Vivo has bended the back of the Vivo U20 which makes
it somewhat more agreeable to hold. The Vivo U20 (Review) is somewhat thicker
and heavier than the Redmi Note 8 however you wouldn't see that except if you
are utilizing them both one next to the other.
Xiaomi offers a USB Type-C port and an IR
producer on the Redmi Note 8. Vivo doesn't offer an IR producer, which can be
pardoned, however the decision of Micro-USB port is an all the more
disillusioning. Numerous potential purchasers may have favored an advanced
Type-C port on the Vivo U20.
The Redmi Note 8 is littler in size and packs
a 6.39-inch full-HD+ show, while the Vivo U20 has a 6.53-inch show. Since the
Vivo U20 is greater, its back mounted unique mark scanner isn't as simple to
reach as the one on the Redmi Note 8.
Xiaomi's offering packs in a quad-camera
arrangement while the Vivo U20 sports a triple camera arrangement at the back.
We found that the camera module on the Note 8 projects an excess of making the
telephone rock when put on a level surface.
Generally speaking the Redmi Note 8 looks and
feels increasingly premium and wins this portion pretty convincingly.
Redmi Note 8 Vs Vivo U20 Details And Programming
The Redmi Note 8 is fueled by the Qualcomm
Snapdragon 665 SoC and has two variations. The base variation with 4GB of RAM
and 64GB of capacity is evaluated at Rs. 9,999 though the higher variation with
6GB of RAM and 128GB of capacity is evaluated at Rs. 12,999. Capacity is
expandable utilizing a microSD card in the telephone's committed space. Xiaomi
offered the Redmi Note 8 is three shading alternatives: Moonlight White,
Neptune Blue, and Space Black at the hour of dispatch, and has as of late
included a Cosmic Purple shading variation.
Vivo ships the U20 with a Snapdragon 675 SoC
which is one of the most dominant processors accessible in a telephone at this
value point. This model additionally comes in two variations with the base one
donning 4GB of RAM and 64GB of capacity estimated at Rs. 10,999, while the
higher variation with 6GB of RAM and 64GB of capacity is valued at Rs. 11,999.
Much the same as the Redmi Note 8, the U20 additionally has a committed microSD
card opening. Shading choices are relatively restricted as Vivo just offers
this telephone in Racing Black and Blaze Blue.
The Redmi Note 8 packs a 4,000mAh battery
while the Vivo U20 has a greater 5,000mAh one. Both cell phones support for
quick accusing and ship of 18W chargers in their containers. The Redmi Note 8
charges all the more rapidly yet that is just gratitude to its littler battery.
Regarding programming, the Redmi Note 8 runs
MIUI 10 over Android 9 Pie. There is some bloatware that comes preinstalled on
the gadget, and we saw a couple Xiaomi applications as nasty also. You can find
out about the product in detail in our Redmi Note 8 audit. Vivo ships the U20
with FunTouch OS 9.2 over Android 9 Pie. This also has a considerable amount of
preinstalled bloatware and we likewise experienced malicious notices on the
Vivo U20.
The Vivo U20 is the reasonable victor here as
far as equipment as the Snapdragon 675 SoC is significantly more dominant than
the Snapdragon 665. Be that as it may, the Redmi Note 8 increases some ground
by offering better programming.
Redmi Note 8 Vs Vivo
U20 Execution And Battery Life
Everyday assignments can be taken care of by
both these cell phones with no issues. We could perform multiple tasks
effectively also. We watched several recordings on both these cell phones and
found the board on the Vivo U20 to be superior to anything the one on the Redmi
Note 8. Sound yield quality was firmly coordinated for both these gadgets. In
any case, we saw them both as tinny.
We saw the Vivo U20 as speedier to open
utilizing the unique mark scanner just as face acknowledgment. The Redmi Note 8
wasn't a long ways behind, yet the Snapdragon 675 gives the Vivo U20 an edge
here.
Since we had the 6GB RAM variations of both
cell phones, we can analyze their exhibition in benchmarks straightforwardly.
In AnTuTu, the Vivo U20 pulled an unmistakable lead by scoring 210,249 while
the Redmi Note 8 scored 169,832. In Geekbench 5's single-center and
multi-center tests, the Vivo U20 figured out how to score 504 and 1,638
separately. The Redmi Note 8 oversaw 314 and 1,327 in similar tests. Concerning
illustrations benchmarks, the U20 scored 42fps and 7.8fps in GFXBench's T-Rex
and Car Chase scenes individually, while the Redmi Note 8 oversaw 33fps and
6.2fps in similar tests. In light of these outcomes and our encounters with the
two cell phones, we can say that the Vivo U20 is plainly progressively amazing.
We played PUBG Mobile on both cell phones and
the Redmi Note 8 defaulted to the Low preset while the Vivo U20 ran the game at
High settings. The two telephones got warm to the touch in the wake of playing
the game for some time.
As far as battery life, the Vivo U20 has an
unmistakable edge with regards to limit as it packs in a 5,000mAh battery which
is 20 percent greater than the one in the Redmi Note 8. The thing that matters
was obvious in our video circle test where the Redmi Note 8 oversaw 13 hours
and 10 minutes, while the Vivo U20 continued for near 15 hours. Indeed, even
with ordinary use, the Vivo U20 kept going longer contrasted with the Redmi
Note 8.
Charging speeds are comparative however the
Vivo U20 takes longer since it has a greater battery. The Redmi Note 8 charges
to 81 percent in an hour though the Vivo U20 gets to 67 percent simultaneously.
Obviously, the drawback to having a greater battery is that the Vivo U20 is
bulkier and heavier. The Vivo U20 wins this round for better execution and
battery life.
Redmi Note 8 versus Vivo U20 Cameras
The two producers have adopted somewhat
various strategies with regards to the cameras. The Redmi Note 8 has a
quad-camera arrangement while the Vivo U20 has a triple camera arrangement. The
Redmi Note 8 has a 48-megapixel essential sensor, a 8-megapixel wide-edge
camera with a f/2.2 opening, a 2-megapixel large scale camera, and a
2-megapixel profundity sensor. The Vivo U20 then again has a 16-megapixel
essential camera with a Sony IMX499 sensor, a 8-megapixel super-wide-point
camera, and a 2-megapixel full scale camera.
For selfies, the Redmi Note 8 has a
13-megapixel shooter while the Vivo U20 has a 16-megapixel selfie camera. The
camera applications on the two telephones are basic and simple to utilize yet
we might want the designs to be better on both these cell phones.
We took photographs with both these cell
phones simultaneously perceive how they passage under indistinguishable
conditions. The two telephones rushed to center and meter light effectively. In
sunshine shots, both cell phones conveyed comparable degrees of detail. Our
example shots looked great as is yet were grainy on zooming in. We saw
difference and sharpness as better with the Redmi Note 8 contrasted with the
Vivo U20. The wide-point cameras on both these cell phones offer wide field of
view, however we lean toward the one on the Vivo U20. The Redmi Note 8 lifts
differentiate forcefully and tests needed subtleties in the shadows.
In low light, the Redmi Note 8 got the shading
tone of scenes right yet the Vivo U20 figured out how to catch better detail
and the shots it took had less grain obvious on zooming in. With Night Mode
empowered on both cell phones, they had the option to convey more splendid
shots. The Redmi Note 8 hones photographs consequently, making them look
counterfeit. The Vivo U20's shots showed up increasingly characteristic however
we expected to remain superbly still while making a go to dodge obscure.
For close-ups, we found that the Redmi Note 8
caught better hues and furthermore delivered better subtleties which were
noticeable on zooming in. This telephone likewise led the pack when it came to
shooting pictures. It oversaw edge location very well, and delivered better
subtleties. We likewise tried the large scale cameras of the two telephones and
found that the Redmi Note 8 oversaw subtleties much superior to the Vivo U20.
Video recording maxes out at 4K for both cell
phones however neither one of the ones offers adjustment. We additionally
recorded examples at 1080p, and keeping in mind that the two gadgets
implemented adjustment, the Vivo U20 improved employment. Be that as it may,
the U20's recording needed sharpness.
We'll consider it a bind with regards to
selfies, as both cell phones figured out how to catch great shots. On the off
chance that you like sensational impacts, the Redmi Note 8 conveys that sort of
yield. For still photography, the Redmi Note 8 performs better while the Vivo
U20 improves.
Decision
The Vivo U20 and the Redmi Note 8 are both well
known cell phones that are as of now at a bargain at or around Rs. 10,000.
While one offers by and large execution and great battery life, different has
better form quality and better cameras by and large. Picking between the two
won't be simple, yet on the off chance that you are searching for a cell phone
to mess around on, the Vivo U20 is plainly the better decision between the two.
The U20 likewise keeps going longer on each charge, so you won't need to
connect it as regularly. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 has better cameras and is
simpler to bear and utilize. It likewise feels significantly more costly than
it really is. Then again, the Realme 5s (Review) is another as of late
propelled cell phone that you could look at in this spending limit.
✏REDMI NOTE 8
REVIEWS
| |||||||||
⓻
DES
IGN
|
⓼
DIS
PLAY
|
⓻
SOFT
WARE
|
⓻
SHOW
|
⓼
BATT
ERY
|
⓻
CAM
ERA
|
⓼
FOR MON
EY
| |||
✔GOOD
|
✘BAD
| ||||||||
☞ Good Battery Life
☞ Full HD+ Display
|
☞ Bad For Gaming
☞ Camera Quality Is Not Good
☞Preinstalled Bloatware & Irrelevant Notifications In MIUI
| ||||||||
KEY SPECIFICATIONS
| |||||||||
DISPLAY
6.30Inch
|
OS
AndroiD 9 Pie
|
RESOLUTION
1080x2280P
| |||||||
REAR CAMERA
48MP+8MP+2MP+2MP
|
FRONT CAMERA
13MP
|
STORAGE
64GB
| |||||||
RAM
4GB
|
BATTERY
4000mAh
|
PROCESSOR
Snapdragon 665
| |||||||
BUY AT
|
amazon.in
|
Redmi Note 8 4GB Slam Space Black 64GB Capacity – Click Here To Go The Page
| |||||||
TATA CLIQ
|
Redmi Note 8 4GB Slam Ruby Red 64GB Capacity – Click Here To Go To The Page
|
✏VIVO U20
REVIEWS
| |||||||||
⓻
DES
IGN
|
⓼
DIS
PLAY
|
⓻
SOF
TWARE
|
⓼
SHOW
|
⓼
BATT
ERY
|
⓻
CAM
ERA
|
⓼
FOR MONEY
| |||
✔GOOD
|
✘BAD
| ||||||||
☞ Full-HD+ Display
☞ Nice Battery Life
☞ Great Performance/Show
|
☞ Micro-USB Port
☞ Lacks Camera Performances
☞ Preinstalled Bloatware
| ||||||||
KEY SPECIFICATIONS
| |||||||||
DISPLAY
6.53Inch
|
OS
Android 9 Pie
|
RESOLUTION
1080x2340P
| |||||||
REAR CAMERA
16MP+8MP+
2MP
|
FRONT CAMERA
16MP
|
STORAGE
64GB
| |||||||
RAM
4GB
|
BATTERY
5000mAh
|
PROCESSOR
Snapdragon 675
| |||||||
ALSO
SEE |
amazon.in
| ||||||||
amazon.in
| |||||||||
amazon.in
|
For The Most
Recent Tech News and Reviews,
Take After TECHNOXMART on Twitter, Facebook, and Subscribe Here Now.
For The Most Recent Tech News and Reviews, Take After TECHNOXMART on Twitter, Facebook, and Subscribe Here Now.
No comments:
Post a Comment